Welcome back to Stockhouse
Member Sign In

Email or Username:

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Enter your email address:
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

Get our Best Content in Your Email

You are already a member! Please enter your password to sign in.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Insiders  |  Valuation


Alternate Symbol(s):  WCTXF

"LiCo Energy Metals Inc is an exploration stage company. It is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of Lithium and Cobalt projects. The company has four ongoing projects in Chile, Canada, and the United States."

warning The Market Capitalization number on this page may not be displayed correctly. Click here for more information.

Latest Bullboard Posts

Fast track Teledyne, - offtake deal next?

Cobalt prices rallys like never before and Licos prime project continues to deliver on fantastic results of Cobalt, a small reminder of...
Aton - 3 hours ago

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:More good results: 21.9% and 18.7% Co

You clearly took your time to put your thoughts on paper. Thanks for that norbu1. In addition to your writing, one should consider the...
Ashaman - 4 hours ago

RE:BIG Results keep coming

I´m not so sure this will happen, remember Lico is different from the other small juniors, Lico have already a full size mine with...
Aton - 5 hours ago

BIG Results keep coming

Then LIC won't ever produce because they will be bought out!!!!  With more results like fridays we WILL be bought out.
Stockpile4 - 14 hours ago

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:More good results: 21.9% and 18.7% Co

SORRY, ANOTHER TYPO - CPO is trading at 0.27/share and I assign a value of 2x 0.27 to LIC and then subtract all of the negatives to get )...
norbu1 - 20 hours ago

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:More good results: 21.9% and 18.7% Co

MISTAKE, my oriignal post should read 5/1, NOT 3/1, a typo only.  Hopefully, this now makes better sense. Norbu1
norbu1 - 21 hours ago