Taking it to the streets. Stockhouse.com: Taking it to the street

Changes in fund mandates, risk averse brokers, and sellers with itchy trigger fingers




Stockhouse Ticker Trax is equity specific research (Canadian listed and market cap < $300 million) published every Monday to paid subscribers. Our free Friday column may feature companies previously featured to paid subscribers (with a minimum one month delay) or discuss topics of interest to the general investment community and relevant to overall portfolio management.


On Thursday, the U.S. Federal Reserve lit a fire under equities and justified the inflationary reasons (both short and long term) to be bullish on the already high prices of gold, silver, and oil – not to mention several other commodities.

However, even as penny stocks trade near low valuations not seen for decades, we can only move ahead in baby steps with these higher-risk equities.

The past 18 months has seen dramatic changes in the landscape for micro cap stocks (typically valuations under $200 to $300 million) and while the returns can be exceptionally high, the risks and liquidity are the trade-off.

A glaring problem is the overhang of paper that has been underwater for well over a year now and is simply waiting for an excuse to free up cash (marginally higher prices and liquidity). From a Canadian perspective the benchmark is the TSX Venture Composite Index which until recently was down 50% from spring 2011.

The stocks in this index are expected to be the best-in-class so you can imagine how poorly the lower-quality equities have performed.  For many the average loss was in the range of 70%!

These losses have been devastating for the corporations, retail investors, wealth managers (stock brokers) and their firms, analysts, and fund managers.

In fact, the poor equity performance of these small stocks has created a dramatic shift in the industry and this is where the real challenges lie ahead over the next year.

When we came out of the economic collapse in Q4/08 and Q1/09, the small stocks generated remarkable gains over the next two years. As a newsletter writer I picked just over 100 companies during that period and lost money on about a dozen while the huge majority gained (on average) well over 100% or more.

While I would like to think the same thing will happen from these current levels over the next year or more, it is difficult knowing what to expect going forwardfor the following reasons.

1) The increased buying and liquidity means many stocks must now eat through boat loads of paper that many larger shareholders (funds in particular) have been sitting on throughout 2012 waiting to liquidate. This won’t occur overnight and the challenge is having a strong enough market environment where buying is sustainable and lasts more than a week.

2) Wealth advisors (stock brokers) have seen their industry change dramatically over the past few years. The majority have moved to a fee based system where they don’t depend upon straight commission but receive a percentage of a client’s overall portfolio value. This means they don’t want risky bets because it hurts the advisor and the clients.

3) For Canadian public companies in particular, they have depended upon the brokers for financing and recommending their stock to clients. As junior equities have eroded in value, many who focused on that side of the business have left to pursue other careers or shifted their business model to concentrate on mid to large caps that preserve wealth and keep their clients from leaving due to negative returns.

4) With the popularity of ETFs for almost every aspect of the equity market (including gold exploration stocks), many retail investors have taken the easy route and simply put their money into an ETF fund (similar to a mutual fund). This saves them the risk of being wrong and the effort of doing their own research. The problem is, there are many misconceptions (and risks) with ETFs. Either way, this has pulled a tremendous amount of money away from junior equities.

5) Disposable income has eroded as personal debt levels grow and the expenses of running a home and supporting a family rise dramatically. This cuts into the money that is used to speculate on penny stocks.

6) For the past several years we have seen more and more brokerage firms in the United States prevent their advisors from recommending or even buying penny stocks. This doesn’t impact self-managed accounts through discount brokerages but full service still accounts for a huge percentage of equity trading. This past year the situation has become worse so it removes a lot of liquidity from the junior equities.

7) For public companies (many in desperate need of cash), they have diluted (damaged) their share structure dramatically. Not on the scale you would see in Australia or Asia (where they seem to have no problem with a billion shares outstanding and a three cent share price), but still a dramatic difference for Canadian or American investors.

8) Fund managers always experience turnover and in 2012 the new managers are cleaning house on old positions. Often the first to go are the small stocks and we have seen this hurt the junior exploration stocks particularly hard over the past year (although it has been building for 18 months). Many juniors financed with these funds and they were the first to throw the company under the bus – and still are unfortunately. While many have liquidated their positions throughout 2012, a lot of old paper still exists in the system – and it will take some time to eat through these large share positions. New funds will come to the table but they will be much more selective.

In light of all this, a huge amount of money has been sitting on the sidelines and in typical herd mentality, sector interest can change quickly and last for months.

If a sector rallies, investors pile in when they feel they are missing the bus. Even with all the points I mentioned above, this psychology of the market will never change. It may just be tempered somewhat in overall volume.

Risk /reward

My own personal strategy is to employ the same valuation methods I did following Q1/09 but whether they work as successfully in this new environment I am not sure. One would tend to think so (even if the overall gains were less) but the playing field is definitely different than what we have seen at any time in penny stock history.

Either way, speculating on these stocks can be exciting and financially very rewarding. You just need a realistic expectation of percentage gains this next year and the stomach to absorb losses.

I have been researching and buying these volatile stocks for over 30 years now and I still lose money and shake my head in amazement at the dumb decisions some management groups make with other people’s money.

That will never change and the fact you lose money on these speculations will never change. But it only takes a few nice hits to absorb realistic losses and the gains can be quite exceptional.

_______________________________________________________________________

In addition to this weekend column and the bottom fishing research sent to paid Ticker Trax subscribers on Monday, I also provide free MicroCap alerts throughout the week. These are based upon News or Abnormal Price/Volume Activity on the several hundred stocks we track from our own research, brokerage analysts, or third-party newsletter writers. 

http://www.stockhouse.com/Groups/GroupInfo.aspx?g=50540

http://twitter.com/TSXAlerts

_______________________________________________________________________

Subscribe to Ticker Trax Now

 

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Danny Deadlock, TickerTrax

In addition to the editorial published on Stockhouse, Danny Deadock is lead analyst and publisher of MicroCap.com. With over 25 years experience speculating on penny stocks, their focus is Canadian juniors traded on the TSX and TSX.V. The service covers various sectors but is weighted towards natural resources. Annual cost is $163 Cdn. For details, please visit www.microcap.com

Danny Deadlock now writes and researches for Stockhouse's Ticker Trax once a week. Stockhouse launched the Ticker Trax service in November 2008. Please see www.tickertrax.com for more.

More Danny Deadlock via Stockhouse: Click Here

More Ticker Trax by Danny Deadlock via Stockhouse: Click Here



 
 
Comments
Dead right, Deadlock. I am a retail zombie, roving the Venture exchange, seeking out that life-giving infusion of capital. May be that it's a futile exercise.
I think that a lot of shareholders feel the way I do, namely that management does not care about the shareholders, they just care about getting money to pay their wages and so dilution is no big deal for them. Plus they mislead when stating the potential of the properties, thus drilling and spending money on properties which will never develop a mine. Almost no company has profitably mined gold at less than 1 gram per ton, yet the companies chase low grade plays. How on earth can companies that were mining at $400 gold 10 years ago be still losing money at $1,600 gold? Why would I invest. I switched from mining to oil and gas, at least with oil and gas, when you find something, you can sell it and start making money almost immediately and with no share dilution unlike a gold mine where it will take years and much dilution to see any profits from it.
There is a speific process to engage in a reverse split or consolidation. It must be passed by shareholders voting at a Special Meeting. You need at least 5% of the shareholders asking, in writing, for a resolution to be added to the agenda of an AGM. The other possibility is, if you can muster up at least 10% of shareholders who support it, in writing, you can ask the company to call a Special Meeting to deal with the issue. There is protocol to be followed. If such a vote passed, it would permit the Board to authorize a restructuring of the capital structure (reverse split), and to place limits on the ratio of consolidation. (ie 5 to 1, 10 to 1, 20 to 1, etc......you get the idea)!
great post and great coments !!! i agfre with it all and it reinforces my choice of castillian resorses --ct with bill pearson ay the helm ( last so called dog old mine was sold to yamana everybody made out great and now at this moment it is yamanas bedt gold mine resposible for 40 percent of revenue --- anyway ------- he always back stops his company when he sold a nickel property in tanzania he retained 15 percent of the company 5 million shares and he will be able to sell them oct 18th perfect timing as they hit a hug graphite deposit high drade too and the stock went to 60c and is going through a natural pull back but im confident buy oct 18th it will have gone through that and will starty going back up and will be at least 60c so we dont need new finacing but if they want more they have large already in that will give them money no problem and its only a question of time till its a mine
We can have our own opinions on rollbacks, but it would seem they are a sort of red flag. Im more concerned in the long run, with point 2 and point 3, the distributors or financiers of juniors. It is getting more difficult for public companies to raise funds owing to the fact, that there are even less reliable distribution points for their shares. Microcaps will have an even more difficult time raising dollars, as larger funds wont consider, nor likely are not eligible to place capital into these relatively small startup types. However, if we are to find the large discoveries to keep the exploration dollars available, then the microcaps must need more avenues to fund.
Thanks for comments.. Typically any company doing a rollback to clean up share structure I will automatically cross off my DD list. Why? Chances are they have moose pasture and poor management.
Item 7 for sure is a major problem. Companies are being forced to clean up share structure to attract "any" financing. Typically this also reflects poorly on management making the situation worse. More often than not the share price falls further after the consolidation. In the past 30 days alone here are some of the TSX.V companies trying to clean up share structure - CML 40:1 , STI - 10:1 , GXM - 10:1 , RBM - 20:1 , SXL - 10:1 , OM - 10:1 , GPS - 10:1 , MKU - 4:1 , FV - 5:1 , COA - 2:1 , DUN - 10:1 , MWC - 20:1
Banjo, exchange put in a rule which is temporary I believe, financing can be done below 5 cents in certain cases, and they are not to be to insiders. I think for most companies over 20 million shares that are not producing or close to producing, stocks will do nothing but churn volume for the most part, with sellers paring off the companies that didnt use capital as well as others. Im working on an efficiency index for Venture capital companies, that would show how effectively companies put their funds to work. In the meantime, stick with production or close to production, shell type companies with great management and good ability to finance and pare off the companies with a bloated float, sometimes if they even are producing, 300 million shares and having to raise money is sometimes a chore.
From what I understand a rollback occurs when a company's share price gets so low that they fear being de-listed from the exchange. I'm wondering if the exchanges are being more tolerant of low share prices lately as there are so many now? Rollbacks are one of my big fears when investing in a company. Lately it's been like walking on thin ice when investing. I agree that many companies will fold in the coming year the way things are looking.
Number 7 is a huge problem. I see lots of companies on the venture with under $500,000 in cash. Not long till they burn through this. You can not even do much exploration with that. These companies will be forced to fold up shop in the next 6 - 10 months which will be good in the long run for the industry. Cheers J54 www.pennyminingstocks.com
 
 
Stockhouse Conflict and Disclosure Policy:

Stockhouse publishing Ltd., owners and operators of Stockhouse.com, has established the following rules to ensure that there is no appearance of impropriety on the part of any Stockhouse Editorial writers ("Writers"). The content of Stockhouse Editorial articles (the "Articles") are the opinion of the Writer and any reliance on the content of these articles is at your sole risk. Our Writers are not registered investment advisors. You should not make any kind of investment decision in relation to Articles or stocks discussed in them without obtaining advice from a registered investment advisor.

Facts relied upon by our Writers are generally provided by the subject companies or gathered by our Writers from other public and/or private sources. These facts may be in error and if so, the opinions of our Writers may be materially different.

Writers may own, buy, or sell shares in public companies mentioned in their Articles, but in the Article they must prominently state their ownership position. Thus, a conflict may exist. Writers are not permitted to write Articles that attempt to benefit persons connected to the Writer, such as family or friends, except where disclosure is made in the same way as if the Writer him/herself owns stock.

Writers cannot solicit, accept, or agree to receive anything of value given or paid with the intent of influencing their Articles.

Stockhouse notifies each Writer about these rules, and we rely on the integrity of our Writers to ensure that our rules are followed.

 
 
 
 
 
Today's Feature  
 
Pacific North West Capital Corp.
Pacific North West Capital Corp. (TSX: PFN; OTCQX: PAWEF; Frankfurt: P7J) is a mineral exploration company focused on the discovery, exploration and development of PGM and nickel-copper sulphide deposits in geologically prospective regions in North America, particularly Canada. The Company's key asset is its 100% owned River Valley PGM Project in the Sudbury region of northern Ontario. The River Valley Project is one of North America's most advanced primary PGM deposits...