Close

Welcome back to Stockhouse
Member Sign In

Email or Username:
Password:
Close

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Enter your email address:
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

STANDUP Advice: Presumptuous Questions

John J. De Goey, CFP
0 Comments|July 20, 2007

Market forecasters are offering little more than educated guesses.
Market forecasters are offering little more than educated guesses.

Real advisors don't forecast. The simple fact of the matter is that markets cannot reliably know what the future holds and as soon as the outcome is obvious, current prices/ trends/ rates reflect the new reality (even if it is weeks or months before coming to fruition). Here's a quick quiz for advisors to do a self-assessment of their practices. For consumers reading this, my view is that if your advisor is coming to you with "advice" about the things listed below, that "advice" is likely penny-wise and pound foolish in that it deals with ephemeral sound bites rather than long-term planning. Here are the questions:

  1. What themes are you recommending to your clients this year?
  2. How do you see markets performing this quarter?
  3. What are your favourite picks/ sectors/ stocks/ funds today?
  4. Where do you see interest rates going?
  5. Where do you think the dollar will be one year from now?
  6. Is now the time to jump into (or get out of) investment X?

These questions and others like them are all predicated on the person being asked making a reliable forecast about what the future has in store. Some might say that these questions are not designed to be forecasts, but rather to draw out opinions and preferences. I don't buy it. If personal opinions and preferences were all that the person doing the asking was after, then what would it accomplish? That being said, most people recognize that advisors merely offer up an "educated opinion" and few people actually expect them to make uniformly accurate forecasts.

Still, as is so often the case in life, virtually everyone has an opinion. The difference is that the majority of "talking heads" that offer up commentary regarding capital markets take themselves far too seriously in their presumed ability to foretell the future. In this case, informed opinion is still merely one person's viewpoint.

Uninformed people often disclaim their views as nothing more than personal, uninformed views. They usually don't take themselves seriously. In contrast, the people who "know what they're talking about" act as though knowing the subject matter gives them some particularly useful insight. It doesn't. It gives them perspective. The most insightful thing these people could possibly share is that even they, the "experts" are offering nothing more than an opinion. In the end, an educated guess is still a guess and people with a PhD in finance aren't all that much better at predicting (for instance) interest rate moves than a random man on the street.

Advisors, if they have contemplated their role thoughtfully, should aim to focus on those things where they can make a real difference. Management of anything requires control. If you can't control something, you can't manage it. No one can control capital market behaviour. As such, anyone who purports to be able to manage portfolios in a way that allows people to take advantage of mispricings, trading opportunities, temporary lapses in judgment and the like is likely overplaying their hand.

Really good advisors (read: STANDUP Advisors) know that Scientific Testing And Necessary Disclosure Underpin Professionalism. In short, STANDUP Advisors ask themselves "what does the research say and how can I best disclose/ explain it to my clients?" Opinions are like noses- everyone has one. Having a nose, however, doesn't mean you'll be able to "smell out" the next great buying opportunity.


John J. De Goey, CFP is a Senior Financial Advisor with Burgeonvest Securities Limited (BSL) and author of The Professional Financial Advisor II. The views expressed are not necessarily shared by BSL. www.burgeonvest.com www.johndegoey.com





StockHouse Conflict and Disclosure Policy:

Stockgroup Media Inc., owners and operators of StockHouse.ca/com, has established rules to ensure that there is no appearance of impropriety on the part of any StockHouse writers who discuss or name individual public companies in the content published on the StockHouse websites. The content of StockHouse Editorial articles are the opinion of the writer and any reliance on the content of these articles shall be at your sole risk.

StockHouse Editorial writers may own, buy, or sell shares in public companies mentioned in their articles. Please be advised that a conflict may exist and that any investment decisions you make are your own responsibility. Additionally, our Editorial writers are not registered investment advisors. You should not make any kind of investment decision in relation to these articles or stocks discussed in them without first obtaining independent investment advice from a registered investment advisor.

Facts relied upon by our Editorial writers in arriving at their opinions are generally provided by the subject companies or gathered by our Editorial writers from other public and/or private sources. These facts may be in error and if so, the opinions of our Editorial writers may be materially different.

Rules applying to StockHouse Editorial Writers

StockHouse Editorial writers may own stock of any company they cover, but at the bottom of the article or within the article they must clearly and prominently state their ownership position in the company.

StockHouse Editorial writers cannot solicit, accept, or agree to receive anything of value given or paid with the intent of influencing their editorial articles published on StockHouse.

StockHouse Editorial writers are not permitted to write articles that attempt to influence or benefit persons connected to the writer such as family or friends, , except where disclosure is made in the same way as if the writer him/herself owns stock.

StockHouse notifies each Editorial writer about these rules but in case of a possible breach of our rules, we may not be in a position to find out or investigate the facts. We rely on the integrity of our writers to ensure that our rules are followed.



Tags:

Rate this article
3 stars
v
Usefulness

Clarity

Credibility
Add to favourites icon Add to favourites

Comments

No comments yet. Be first to comment!

Leave a Message

You must be logged in to access this feature.