Taking it to the streets. Stockhouse.com: Taking it to the street

Management Issues themselves 6 million cheap options after shareholders took Massive Losses




Stockhouse Ticker Trax is equity specific research (Canadian listed and market cap < $300 million) published every Monday to paid subscribers. Our free Friday column may feature companies previously featured to paid subscribers (with a minimum one month delay) or discuss topics of interest to the general investment community and relevant to overall portfolio management.


http://www.stockhouse.com:80/community-news/2012/june/15/bottom-fishing-canaco-discounted-$95-million-cash

Note: Canaco was originally presented to paid Ticker Trax subscribers on June 4th at 31 cents and featured for free in our weekend Stockhouse report June 15th at 33 cents. The stock hit 42 cents last Friday but has been under pressure all week (I have explained why below). Above is a link to the original June 15th report entitled “Bottom Fishing Canaco’s Discounted $95 Million Cash”.

Canaco Resources (CAN.V 36 cents) 

www.canaco.ca

I research Canadian penny stocks for a living and have for almost thirty years now. They create the opportunity for tremendous capital gains and if properly researched and managed, losses can be realistically mitigated.  

Every few months I come across a decision by management of some company that simply has me shaking my head in disgust.

Long story short, In 2011 and 2012 Canaco Resources Inc. (TSX: V.CAN, Stock Forum) was a gold play in Africa that over-promised and grossly under-delivered. Several Canadian mining analysts prior to May had targets ranging anywhere from the mid $1 range to several dollars.

May 15th 2012 they released their much anticipated gold resource report. It was a fraction of the several million ounces everyone was expecting. Following the news, large shareholders destroyed the stock as they dumped their positions and took huge losses.

In March 2011 Canaco raised almost $140 million above $5 per share.

Following the share price collapse in May, I overlooked the failed exploration project in favor of the opportunity to bottom fish grossly discounted cash. After all, if the cash burn is controlled, cash is cash. I gave management the benefit of doubt although the street had little good to say about this company.

Buried at the end of an August 7th News Release:

“The board has granted six million stock options to directors, officers and consultants pursuant to Canaco's stock option plan. The options have an exercise price of 40 cents per share and an expiry date of Aug. 3, 2017”  

This company’s management simply validated their very poor street reputation by issuing themselves 6 million stock options. The management according to their own powerpoint presentation only owns 2% of the stock outstanding – which in itself is ridiculous. Then they go ahead and “award” themselves this huge stock option position after a year of stock performance that (for lack of a better term) was pathetic.

Stock options were designed to reward good performance. Not be abused and simply serve as a method for management to line their own pockets. Quite frankly I am surprised there hasn’t been a shareholder revolt prior to this that saw management replaced. Not only was the number of options granted grossly excessive (based on past performance) but they are good for five years (not exactly a vote of self-confidence in your ability to grow shareholder value !)

I own the stock simply because of the cash discount and the recent announcement of their involvement with China. However, I can sure see why it sold off again heavily after running over 40 cents late last week.

These people should be embarassed running a public company like this. And I am quite shocked the board of directors continues to support it. However, if the payday (the 6 million options) is a big enough incentive and they are getting a good chunk of it, why wouldn’t they support it ? Obviously the board doesn’t have an ethics committee – or at least a proper one.

All I know, if I was an institutional money manager and owned a large share position in this company, I would be orchestrating something to seriously shake up this management group and board of directors. When a small company has $95 million they could do some amazing things with it in this market (when junior valuations are so deeply depressed).

However, in the hands of the wrong people, that money can be easily wasted or just as bad, becomes a long term retirement project as senior management spends their time cycling through deal after deal simply to ensure they have big expense accounts and big pay cheques – essentially for doing nothing. I have seen this a lot with small cash rich TSX and TSX.V companies.

And given Canaco’s past track record, I have a sneaking suspicion this company may be no different. Without a major shakeup in management, few will have any faith in their ability to grow shareholder value.

I personally will hold the stock for a couple quarters simply because of the big cash discount and hoping senior management is replaced by people more ethical and experienced, but otherwise would dump the paper and move onto something else.

Typically in this type of scenario, management doesn’t really care about small retail shareholders because of the (well paid) retirement project scenario. After the announcement with China on August 2nd I was hoping otherwise, but after they rewarded themselves with 6 million options, I will be shocked if this amounts to anything in 2012 unless we see a shareholder revolt.

As a shareholder who only bought in May at 32 cents I am mad. If I was part of the group who financed the $140 million above $5 per share, I would be furious.

It is a real shame and another reason the small companies keep losing credibility on the TSX and TSX Venture (it is not the fault of the exchange because these companies stay within regulatory guidelines).

This is a question of Integrity (or lack of it) when you are given responsibility for other people’s money.


In addition to this weekend column and the bottom fishing research sent to paid Ticker Trax subscribers on Monday, I also provide free MicroCap alerts throughout the week. These are based upon News or Abnormal Price/Volume Activity on the several hundred stocks we track from our own research, brokerage analysts, or third-party newsletter writers. 

http://www.stockhouse.com/Groups/GroupInfo.aspx?g=50540

http://twitter.com/TSXAlerts


Disclosure: Danny Danny Deadlock owns 30,000 shares of Canaco.

Subscribe to Ticker Trax Now

 

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Danny Deadlock, TickerTrax

In addition to the editorial published on Stockhouse, Danny Deadock is lead analyst and publisher of MicroCap.com. With over 25 years experience speculating on penny stocks, their focus is Canadian juniors traded on the TSX and TSX.V. The service covers various sectors but is weighted towards natural resources. Annual cost is $163 Cdn. For details, please visit www.microcap.com

Danny Deadlock now writes and researches for Stockhouse's Ticker Trax once a week. Stockhouse launched the Ticker Trax service in November 2008. Please see www.tickertrax.com for more.

More Danny Deadlock via Stockhouse: Click Here

More Ticker Trax by Danny Deadlock via Stockhouse: Click Here



 
 
Comments
Even though not everyone agrees with Danny Deadlock, this was a very interesting and informative aricle he wrote on Canaco..The other Companies Canaco managemnet have sure are not in the same LEAGUE as Canaco.
I would love to see what your rate of return is on your tsx v picks over the past couple years.
so you remove critical posts now? That's weak. Post your track record.
IS this as bad as the 1000s of companies on CDNX that hop from promotion to promotion from property to property from hot sector to hot sector fianancing themselves with pps and options only to see them fail and then off to a new story.
Thanks for the read. WE should never be surprised about human behaviour when it comes to money and property. I too like penny stocks and have learned a couple of lessons about my stupidity- trick is to converty learning to action. Far too many managers out there with other agendas so be most careful, and when a mining or petroleum company starts pumping their project in advance of 'final' results you are getting a wakeup call.
I would say CAN is a pretty average Canadian company . I recently had a bad experience with CTL , Catalyst Paper . The co. had enourmous debt at up to 17% interest . They reorganized with present shareholders losing everything . All new shares revert to the debt holders . The company still owes the debt at a slightly reduced rate. The same management remains in place . Naturally shareholders and unions balked , BUT , a BC supreme court judge let them vote and reote until they got their way . Only in Canada . A few months ago in the US I saw a article that rated Canadian security regulation as the worst in the western world ahead of only Bulgaria whose financial markets are still quite young.
This is an outstanding article that publicly echoes the sentiment of many retail investors who collectively did not possess a large enough shareholder base to do anything about it. It is also a systemic problem that occurs among many suspect Venture exchange companies. The remedy for this is to disallow zero stock options and no bonus salaries in situations where management has failed miserably and the stock price has collapsed as a result. Otherwise, this awarding of dirt cheap options becomes a means of rewarding poor and reckless decisions by management. An analogy is similar to how the big banks fail after making risky derivative bets but they retain their jobs, salaries, and bonuses after being bailed out by government/taxpayers. Rewarding for poor performance is pathetic.
2 shells with 10 million cash and no deals yet ,RIV and MRV 25 and 7 cent share price low O/S.Better shot than CAN .
Some great comments / feedback - thanks you guys. This is definitely an ongoing concern for many penny stock investors. I avoid the OTCBB and Pinks entirely because of the nonsense that is allowed to occur with respect to manipulation by market makers, poor share structure, granting of options, etc. I like to believe the TSX and TSX.V is better but often you really have to wonder when we're continually seeing this happen. Unfortunately if professional money managers don't take a stand, it seems the typical retail investor is left with few options but to sell out of frustration - and in typical fashion we have gained nothing. Instead of an Occupy Wall Street movement maybe we can finance tents & Beer for an "Occupy Bay and Howe Street Movement" in 2013 :)
The options abuse problem is systemic throughout the all industries.Regulators do not seem to care if management of less than ethical companies financially rape their SH's. Institutions that hold stock & sit on these boards that allow this to go on must themselves shoulder some of the blame. Anyone can open a public company & pay themselves basically any wages & compensation they desire without much reprecussion from their SH's or regulators. BOD's have become filled with nepotism from within the industry & CEO's sit on multiple boards CFO & other key insiders also sit on the boards & dominate the agenda so who's to fire the greedy,incompetent, & ineffective management that infests many companies.Uninformed retail SH's gamble buying into these companies hoping to strike it rich like a lottery ticket & are also part of the problem.They always seem to think issing options is not their money. Read the prospectus most pages are about compensation not goals.Says it all IMO.
It's unfortunate to see things like this happen. I'm glad I exited when I did.
Interesting article - one wonders why such things are not seen as fraud by the regulators ?? No wonder eveyone says the regulators are seen as toothless tigers - Retail SHs are fleeced out by EVERYONE... by the robo warriors who penny-flip small lots, by crooked MMs with their false bids and asks, and then when and if they survive that, the mgmt of their own company dilute their holdings with cheap options and fill their own pockets. Investing on the tsx and the tsxv is just a game for chumps...another example where something similar has happened is with Avion Gold(AVR) - mgmt issued themselves over 8M cheap options at the 2 yr low price( when the stock price has been on a steady decline over the past year) and then go ahead and sell the company 3 weeks after that!!! WHY does BCSC turn a blind eye to this???
You want another one... go look at LFD.. give a div then take the div away? .. everyone and thier dog complained... board was changed.. so maybe same thing needs to happen with Can
Very good article, behavior like theirs gives the venture exchange a black eye and will discourage retail investors from investing in venture listed stocks. The problem is Sinotech is the major shareholder and I am sure they are "beholding" to CAN management for the $32.4 million Sinotech made by selling 6 million shares at $5.40. One could suggest that this may have all been orchestraded. Its ironic that Sinotech sold 6 million shares and CAN management gave themselves 6 million cheap options. Quite the coincidence. ALL IMHO
 
 
Stockhouse Conflict and Disclosure Policy:

Stockhouse publishing Ltd., owners and operators of Stockhouse.com, has established the following rules to ensure that there is no appearance of impropriety on the part of any Stockhouse Editorial writers ("Writers"). The content of Stockhouse Editorial articles (the "Articles") are the opinion of the Writer and any reliance on the content of these articles is at your sole risk. Our Writers are not registered investment advisors. You should not make any kind of investment decision in relation to Articles or stocks discussed in them without obtaining advice from a registered investment advisor.

Facts relied upon by our Writers are generally provided by the subject companies or gathered by our Writers from other public and/or private sources. These facts may be in error and if so, the opinions of our Writers may be materially different.

Writers may own, buy, or sell shares in public companies mentioned in their Articles, but in the Article they must prominently state their ownership position. Thus, a conflict may exist. Writers are not permitted to write Articles that attempt to benefit persons connected to the Writer, such as family or friends, except where disclosure is made in the same way as if the Writer him/herself owns stock.

Writers cannot solicit, accept, or agree to receive anything of value given or paid with the intent of influencing their Articles.

Stockhouse notifies each Writer about these rules, and we rely on the integrity of our Writers to ensure that our rules are followed.

 
 
 
 
 
Today's Feature  
 
Pacific North West Capital Corp.
Pacific North West Capital Corp. (TSX: PFN; OTCQX: PAWEF; Frankfurt: P7J) is a mineral exploration company focused on the discovery, exploration and development of PGM and nickel-copper sulphide deposits in geologically prospective regions in North America, particularly Canada. The Company's key asset is its 100% owned River Valley PGM Project in the Sudbury region of northern Ontario. The River Valley Project is one of North America's most advanced primary PGM deposits...