john378’s details
| symbol | subject | date & time | rating |
|
|
When push comes to shove Shackle, all IDC has really been is a one trick pony, which is a single 13 year old support contract for the Canadian military. It is what supplies their paycheques and subsidizes all their other efforts which are all mon... |
5/16/2013 12:42:12 PM |
|
|
|
They lost money but they are optimistic about tomorrow. I think this company has been pairing up those words about as long as hotdog wiener has been paired up with a bun. Oh well, good luck next quarter. |
4/29/2013 7:01:25 PM |
3 |
|
|
Actually it is 28 but who's counting? So Monday is the day? I always have to check in just to see if the day will ever come when this company does anything more than survive to supply a paycheque. From what I read it does not appear that an... |
4/27/2013 9:18:31 PM |
|
|
|
I was holding out slim hope that they were making enough to pay the bills and weather the storm and someday become a stable $3 stock. I knew it was a long shot but the stock is in the basement anyway so there was no further risk, and it was possi... |
4/11/2013 12:48:29 PM |
5 |
|
|
"did the nortel shareholders get any money back ??" Actually they did but it was pennies per share. There were 2 class action suits handled by Garden City Group called Nortel1 and Nortel 2 to cover 2 independent claims of fraud that... |
3/28/2013 10:54:52 AM |
3 |
|
|
PLittle, I have been in the markets longer than most Stockhouse posters have been on this planet, so I will tell you the way it is short and not so sweet. First of all , all common shareholders are equal. The recovery (If any) is based on share... |
3/27/2013 9:42:54 PM |
4 |
|
|
" In front of net assets I omitted the word current. The net current assets would be $37.8 million after adjustment of new figures which means that the company does not have enough current assets to payoff of bank loan of $55.5m. However th... |
2/17/2013 9:29:53 AM |
4 |
|
|
"Why are the principals in this company not being charged with fraud?" Too early, but I would think (hope) that the investigation will lead up to that. |
2/14/2013 6:46:52 PM |
4 |
|
|
"The CTO cliff Weibe was not "sacked". He is the designer and engineer of the tanks." You are right. I was misled by a very poorly worded press release. Mr. Wiebe was the CTO previous to the announcement so why did they say ... |
12/28/2012 4:04:20 PM |
5 |
|
|
"unless there is a major problem with the wording of their contracts.....maybe this is why the CTO was sacked. It makes you wonder if the same problem exists with other oilfield equipment providers." The CTO should not be responsible ... |
12/28/2012 2:50:56 PM |
4 |
|
No additional content to display.
Stockhouse.com: Taking
it to the street
