|
subject |
user |
date & time |
rating |
|
 |
Check it out.Same size resource market cap under 10 million....Not in Canada but hey double it then or triple .....
|
|
6/19/2013 10:28:12 PM |
|
|
|
Ok, lets make a list of National Instrument 43-101's that have 4 QP's who signed it, putting their reputations on the line..... 1. BGM National Instrument 43-101 Potential 30m oz 2. Ummmmm 3. Ummmmm |
|
6/19/2013 10:21:47 PM |
3 |
|
|
|
Bigbab, as promised. I do think that the Cow mtn deposit as reported in this report is viable. I think it has major upside. I think that the 2 gram number is good. I am sure that more oz's will be found here and in the surrounding area. ...
|
|
6/19/2013 9:50:24 PM |
4 |
|
|
Still no indication that they entirely understand what was removed during mining. This will continue to be an issue unless they address it with some UG mapping and surveying. This may cause problems for the OP as well. |
|
6/19/2013 9:39:47 PM |
1 |
|
|
|
[Floor] = valuation of 6m @ [$/oz higher than the highest valuation for juniors since we are the biggest].... [This space in-between is for time to 'Kill the Penalty' assessed....] [Ceiling] = val...
|
|
6/19/2013 9:16:00 PM |
4 |
|
|
They should have included the conceptual pit limits on the one section they did put in there. strip ratio looks high, but whittle will take what you give it and make a pit… with low mining costs and high gold price as input, it will pull ... |
|
6/19/2013 8:44:32 PM |
2 |
|
|
|
$16/oz Gold...man if the asian gold buyers find out (who seem to be willing to pay ten times that) the opening could go ballistic.... Size really does matter, and with BGM being the biggest...well we should be looking back at $50/oz... Hmmm...a...
|
|
6/19/2013 8:34:17 PM |
|
|
|
Many of the longs are of the belief that the BCSC overstepped the QP's on the report. Many think possibly that the actual oz's were much higher and the BCSC fundamentally changed the resource #'s. The only numbers that in my opinion... |
|
6/19/2013 8:28:45 PM |
|
|
|
|
The lack of sections, I suspect, will continue to be an issue here. I don’t think anyone really understands what is going on here or how to model it… not unlike Pretium. Then again, if you can’t identify discrete high grade v...
|
|
6/19/2013 8:17:12 PM |
|
|
|
gonna give BGM credit for 6M oz. 5M at Cow / 200k at BL / 800k credit for geologic potential of 9-27M 6M x $16/per oz =96 M/109 outstanding = .88 cents pretty cheap ounces.... :) dirt cheap actually |
|
6/19/2013 8:10:23 PM |
|
|
|
|
Rant 3 They should have had an equivalent section showing blocks coded as inferred vs indicated. More too follow upon further review
|
|
6/19/2013 7:56:00 PM |
2 |
|
|
Rant 2: The section through the block model looks totally random, despite using what appear to be acceptable anisotropy orientations for the kriged model |
|
6/19/2013 7:54:17 PM |
2 |
|
|
|
Just some rants about the report: Still no geological cross sections – why is that so frickin hard?? or any sections or 3D’s through the wire frames that supposedly constrain the interpolation.
|
|
6/19/2013 7:51:49 PM |
2 |
|
|
Are running scared as jack rabbits...Non stop posting on our board to herd rthe masses.Bottom line stay on p[rivate forum.No one who stayed on this board believes any of your nonsense.Market will decide value if it trades before 1 year deadline.W... |
|
6/19/2013 7:47:21 PM |
2 |
|
|
|
I think the disclaimer in the news release always says that the staff of BCSC is not responsible, etc.... They approved this before they let BGM post it on sedar.
|
|
6/19/2013 7:11:34 PM |
4 |
|
|
I appreciate your posts and insight BigBab..... I just finished supper...was thinking of the movie Jaws... Bigbab, I think your making me out to be the Mayor (in the movie) who says its 'safe to go back into the waters'...(with our rock... |
|
6/19/2013 6:48:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
Looks like their having a group huddle with their bosses on how to find new ways to discredit the 200 page bulletproof report.
|
|
6/19/2013 6:36:42 PM |
|
|
|
One has to wonder how low does gold go. There is newsletter smallcapfinancialwire.com . looks like like a great news service |
|
6/19/2013 6:08:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
Interesting read.
|
|
6/19/2013 6:03:35 PM |
|
|
|
I would like to take the time to congratulate the BGM team for a job well done. BGM has produced a National Instrument 43-101 signed by 4 QP's and approved by the BCSC that clearly states a potential upwards of 30mil oz.... Im sure a s part o... |
|
6/19/2013 5:11:36 PM |
4 |
|
|
|
This 'highly' touted National Instrument 43-101 standard (the one that the BCSC held over BGM's head for 10 months) (the gold standard) has now become the very tool for which longs can parade the new valuation upon...right...? In my...
|
|
6/19/2013 4:25:09 PM |
|
|
|
In my opinion, the valuation range has just been set... 5m low end to 30m high end (for now). A NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 43-101 says so...and this is a rock solid standard. Given that, at what $/oz should one apply to this range? If the current $/oz v... |
|
6/19/2013 4:01:47 PM |
4 |
|
|
|
Can't see the forest through the trees. 4.9ml. oz. resource in the open pit at Cow alone. Nuff said stupid!
|
|
6/19/2013 3:54:22 PM |
4 |
|
|
This should have lite up either way. There's no realy volume. It really provides a perspective on where the sector is. They won't sell it or buy it. |
|
6/19/2013 3:30:13 PM |
|
|
|
|
within the technical report are explanations for why 4M oz resources were classified as inferred, * "Estimates based on the data collected prior to 2009 should be limited to an Inferred Mineral Resource mainly due to the lack of QA/QC r...
|
|
6/19/2013 3:14:23 PM |
3 |
|
Stockhouse.com: Taking
it to the street
