| subject | user |
date & time |
rating |
|
You have no sensible response because you have don't have one-----------Jimwhoknowsanidiotwhenhereadsone |
|
6/18/2013 11:12:03 PM |
|
|
You are the kinda guy that would steal the candy from a laughing babies mouth. So don't give us that self righteous BS my good friend. Jim ..... the Jethro Tull quoter
|
|
6/18/2013 9:24:52 PM |
|
|
Shatner can stick his lies in his ear. If he thought about it instead of trying to burn me ad hominem, he'd realize that anybody who wanted to "paint the tape" would probably be a little smarter than to buy 1000 shares - firstly, i... |
|
6/18/2013 8:12:22 PM |
|
|
ROCKHEAD up to his old tricks perhaps? Jim ( The watchful one )
|
|
6/18/2013 7:10:33 PM |
|
|
Yeah especially that stink bid being pulled. What a joke. |
|
6/18/2013 7:06:26 PM |
|
|
....but if a pumper wanted to boost the SP why wouldn't they wait till end of day? Same thing happened yesterday in the AM and it was sold back down. Funny games being played for sure.
|
|
6/18/2013 4:30:28 PM |
|
|
The cost to a pumper to boost the SP this morning. |
|
6/18/2013 10:38:15 AM |
4 |
|
Just because a troll like Shatner tells me to 'jump,' does not mean I'm gonna ask 'how high?' I have zero interest or time in doing DD on that company and I said as much - so it ain't happening-------------Jim
|
|
6/18/2013 10:27:15 AM |
|
|
Maybe you should at least try to walk the walk Matty. Its getting way to easy to expose you for what you are anymore. JIM. ( The good man ) |
|
6/18/2013 9:22:35 AM |
|
|
I thought your catchphrase was "I believe one can never do enough DD"? And yet you can't even compare CJC's cash position to its peers? Typical.
|
|
6/18/2013 9:17:51 AM |
|
|
I think Shatner is on the crack pipe again. As stated, I don't know enough about the other company to comment on it.-----------------------Jim |
|
6/17/2013 11:26:14 PM |
|
|
Really Jim? Have you been drinking again? Why don't you post a comparison for us? After all, as you say, one can never do enough DD. Albeit phantom DD.
|
|
6/17/2013 6:04:39 PM |
|
|
The monies that CJC has are very good compared to most junior mining companies of their size - and certainly they can drill with this amount. I won't comment on the companies Mr.Steak mentioned, as I don't know enough about them.------Jim |
|
6/17/2013 12:15:28 AM |
|
|
Not desperate at all Jim. I agree 3 million is not a lot and they will have to raise more cash. I am no expert but I think it should at least hold them through sample drilling of La Loutre.
|
|
6/16/2013 9:09:50 PM |
2 |
|
You are exposing what could be construed as another companies shortcomings in an effort to put CJC in a more positive light now? Jeesus Steakhead how desperate can you get? Why don't you call a spade a spade and show the people what the bu... |
|
6/15/2013 10:02:34 AM |
3 |
|
At current valuations its difficult to do much of anything besides exploration and defining the resource. With CJC's cash position of about 3 million, it should sustain them until they are able to better define the "La Loutre" proje...
|
|
6/13/2013 9:55:09 PM |
|
|
June 13, 2013 http://www.engineeringontheedge.com/2013/06/graphene-sensor-boosts-camera-performance/ |
|
6/13/2013 11:18:09 AM |
|
|
June 13, 2013 http://scienceblog.com/63806/spot-welding-graphene-nanoribbons-atom-by-atom/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+scienceblogrssfeed+%28ScienceBlog.com%29
|
|
6/13/2013 11:12:56 AM |
|
|
You called it at a half-penny - and you're running again.------------------------------------------jimwhodoesn'trun |
|
6/13/2013 8:58:02 AM |
1 |
|
Are you going to add that one to the growing list of your imaginary skillsets? Anyways .... tell us Matt ..... which way is up? You don't know? Doesn't look like it. Here ...... let me help you. Four is closer to one half than Ten. 3...
|
|
6/12/2013 10:16:24 PM |
|
|
Seeing as we're being "candid," do you still think CJC sees a half-penny (like you said it would), before falling off the board (like you said it would) - before it hits a dime (like I said it will)?--------------thejimwhoisallforbe... |
|
6/12/2013 8:14:27 PM |
|
|
Jeesh that sounds like the same old tired rhetoric you were spewing out to people here at .11. The very same people who are one trade away from being a three bagger poorer than they were before they bought into your overzealous hype. What good do...
|
|
6/12/2013 7:48:56 PM |
|
|
Actually, Shatner, I just got my three-bagger (in 6 months and a bit, as my jimrockford blog shows) on Pacific Potash (PP on the TSX-V) and at some point (not yet, that's for sure!) will be taking some profits to plow into more CJC. CJC, wi... |
|
6/12/2013 3:56:55 PM |
|
|
June 12, 2013 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/06/130612093539.htm
|
|
6/12/2013 11:32:21 AM |
|
|
Thanks for that CurlyMick. I suppose the company should have submitted the permitting request sooner if they planned on drilling for springtime. Pity they are losing valuable drilling time. At least they are assessing other locations as mentioned... |
|
6/12/2013 9:28:53 AM |
|
|
Stockhouse.com: Taking
it to the street
