Yannio...the pumping tactics of these 'clowns' as you call them are really not that effective when it comes down to it. The entire time these guys have been here touting the 'virtues' of UC the stock has continually sagged, not even enjoying a respectable pop in price that would do a P&D'er proud for his efforts. lol...

This is because the market has caught on both with these types of dishonest folk and the failures/shortcomings of this company in particular. You simply can't come out here and say that because you bought at $.04 you're somehow smarter than those that bought at $.30, many in private placements. The latter never expected UC to crater to this level and a few years ago, $.30 was considered cheap given talk of multiple dollar stock prices just around the corner. You simply have no credibility arguing people don't know how to trade because they bought at higher prices than you when in the context of the times it was a bargain to many at the time. 

The bigger issue here is not that UC is at $.04 versus $.30 but WHY is it at those prices? The discussion here among these people entirely averts that tiny issue but it's the heart of the matter and until its rectified no degree of hyping here is going to alter the downward spiral of this operation. There are systemic issues with UC that need to be addressed and if they can't be it's time for management to level with investors about this company continuing as  going concern in its present form.