Welcome back to Stockhouse
Member Sign In

Email or Username:

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Enter your email address:
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

Get our best content in your email.

You are already a member! Please enter your password to sign in.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Level II  |  Charts  |  Profile  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Analysts  |  Earnings  |  Insiders

Saturn Minerals Inc V.SMI

Sector: Energy | Sub-Sector: Oil & Gas E&P

Saturn Minerals Inc ia an exploration stage company engaged in acquiring, exploring, evaluating and developing economically viable energy and resource deposits in Canada.
Price: $0.12 | Change: $0.00 | %Change: 0.00%
Volume: 31,200 | Day High/Low: 0.12/0.115 | 52 Week High/Low: 0.235/0.11
View modes: 
0 stars


Because JRI is flat broke, delisted and heavily in debt. As far as I am concerned getting involved with them is one of the worst move Stan has ever made.   rate and reply
3 stars


SMI management is unbelievable---they would rather see shareholders bail rather than keep us informed. If it keeps going like present trading, we'll be at JRI last trade @ $.02. On the other hand, more
0 stars


because...because...because...  rate and reply
0 stars


Why.....why......why???  rate and reply
0 stars


They do not hav to go to court. jri has not met any of its obligations toward  Smi. Need an update soon!  rate and reply
0 stars


You may be right but if you listen to CRAIG BOLAND- SMI, consulting geologist on the SMI website, he gives a talk where he says that SMI can [[[ NET ]]] $25 to $30 @ $50 oil. Even at $30 oil, you don& more
0 stars


I was under the impression that the money that JRI was going to get was pulled due to the drop in oil pricing and that is why they have not started drilling.    But that is just may theory.  rate and reply
3 stars


I believe that they are afraid to give an honest update---if they say they are going to court over JRI, this could possibly forestall drilling plans into 2016[[[ maybe 2017]]] and their would be more
0 stars

The favor I asked

Was regular news news releases for investors to keep us tight its so right we are the might we fight for smi why? cause we have hope and shareholders vote yo yo i gotta gooooooo  rate and reply
0 stars

So I emailed IR

I said everytime a small cap guy is on bnn I will call in and pump the stock told them I would say  its sure held out well while oil stocks have collapsed I said I would tell the analyst more
0 stars


Yes that´s how it should work;-) No it was a joke hopefully they will drill soon, it seems that some major problems with Jaguar have been solved... will see what happens  rate and reply
0 stars


So what you are saying is that their is a new plan in place---just let the oil seep to the surface, then suck it up with vacuum trucks. Man, you are a genius.  rate and reply
5 stars


Smi will not drill till Jri either puts up .... Or goes .... I still believe tennis... We will hear something soon... Hopefully before the kiddies are back on the bus!  rate and reply
0 stars


Well.  Thats rather cryptic.  Care to elaborate?  rate and reply
0 stars


nope... No need to drill...  rate and reply
0 stars


And still no news on start date for drilling  rate and reply
0 stars

JRI and loyalty to shareholders

I hope senior  management is not confused in terms of its responsibilities....which are legally to its shareholders. This is a PUBLIC company....not a private one. more
0 stars

RE:RE: GET rid of JRI

Maybe the recent private placements were not for drilling or seismic, but for legal and court costs to start an action against JRI. One way or another, something has to be resolved.  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:Get rid of JRI

Because it´s not so easy...  rate and reply
5 stars

Get rid of JRI

It is beyond my understanding whyStan is not dissociating himself from Jaguar. This company on the brink of bankruptcy has not met any of his commitments toward SMI. Call it loyalty towards an more