Talking about the old company and rehashing provides nothing other than to make people who are not fully knowledgeable about the history of this company with uncertainty.
Why shouldn't people be aware of the behaviour of this company previously? Yes, we have a new figure head -- so far the material results are nadda. Some speculation and overall minor market recovery action has created a bump, 100% sure, and from our highs when the news releases weren't accurate? We are down down down.
My point is the company hasn't been above board historically, and appears to have even manipulated the situation for their own financial gains before releasing material information. Now the delays are magically crossing the tax loss deadline for the year -- it's making me wonder if old habits don't indeed die hard.
I'm wary with Pierhal, he's shown a lack of control and ethics in my personal opinion historically. I also see the upside if this technology is a reality. I've got a few days to figure out what I'm going to do here tax wise, but I think it's a good thing that anyone new to this company has a crystal clear view of the management decisions to date.