maybe this is cliffs issue to why they are not getting any where with all parties ... in cleveland they scratch their heads and brain storm on why they have no answer to their EA PROPOSAL ??? ontc has all their answers to their problems but willy seems not to understand the definition of that is needed for their EA moving forward ... see the prophet seems to be on the same wave length as willy ... company submits EA for mine / smelter / transport route for approval to the gov't ... if the gov't does not agree or understands looking for clarification on issues like alternatives then they send the assessment back to be revised ... cliffs problem to their game plan is they have absolutely nothing concrete for transport for the gov't to say what ever about ??? so if they have nothing solid to work with they can not receive feed back from the gov't let alone approval ... so if they have nothing submitted then how does cliffs complete a feasibility or get approval for an EA ??? IMPOSSIBLE !!! they are only fooling themselves or you must be a complete idiot to believe the story they are filling peoples heads with ???                                                                                                                                                                 

Sustainable transport

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Sustainable transport refers to the broad subject of transport that is or approaches being sustainable. It includes vehicles, energy, infrastructure, roads, railways, airways, waterways, canals, pipelines, and terminals. Transport operations and logistics as well as transit-oriented development are involved. Transportation sustainability is largely being measured by transportation system effectiveness and efficiency as well as the environmental impacts of the system.[1]

Short-term activity often promotes incremental improvement in fuel efficiency and vehicle emissions controls while long-term goals include migrating transportation from fossil-based energy to other alternatives such as renewable energy and use of other renewable resources. The entire life cycle of transport systems is subject to sustainability measurement and optimization.[2]

Sustainable transport systems make a positive contribution to the environmental, social and economic sustainability of the communities they serve. Transport systems exist to provide social and economic connections, and people quickly take up the opportunities offered by increased mobility.[3] The advantages of increased mobility need to be weighed against the environmental, social and economic costs that transport systems pose.

Transport systems have significant impacts on the environment, accounting for between 20% and 25% of world energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions.[4] Greenhouse gas emissions from transport are increasing at a faster rate than any other energy using sector.[5] Road transport is also a major contributor to local air pollution and smog.[6]

The social costs of transport include road crashes, air pollution, physical inactivity,[7] time taken away from the family while commuting and vulnerability to fuel price increases. Many of these negative impacts fall disproportionately on those social groups who are also least likely to own and drive cars.[8] Traffic congestion imposes economic costs by wasting people's time and by slowing the delivery of goods and services.

Traditional transport planning aims to improve mobility, especially for vehicles, and may fail to adequately consider wider impacts. But the real purpose of transport is access - to work, education, goods and services, friends and family - and there are proven techniques to improve access while simultaneously reducing environmental and social impacts, and managing traffic congestion.[9] Communities which are successfully improving the sustainability of their transport networks are doing so as part of a wider programme of creating more vibrant, livable, sustainable cities.



Definition [edit]

The term sustainable transport came into use as a logical follow-on from sustainable development, and is used to describe modes of transport, and systems of transport planning, which are consistent with wider concerns of sustainability. There are many definitions of the sustainable transport, and of the related terms sustainable transportation and sustainable mobility.[10] One such definition, from the European Union Council of Ministers of Transport, defines a sustainable transportation system as one that:

  • Allows the basic access and development needs of individuals, companies and society to be met safely and in a manner consistent with human and ecosystem health, and promotes equity within and between successive generations.
  • Is Affordable, operates fairly and efficiently, offers a choice of transport mode, and supports a competitive economy, as well as balanced regional development.
  • Limits emissions and waste within the planet’s ability to absorb them, uses renewable resources at or below their rates of generation, and uses non-renewable resources at or below the rates of development of renewable substitutes, while minimizing the impact on the use of land and the generation of noise.

Sustainability extends beyond just the operating efficiency and emissions. A Life-cycle assessment involves production and post-use considerations. A cradle-to-cradle design is more important than a focus on a single factor such as energy efficiency.[11