Goseahawks--  Amen.   Even modest DD would have shown nearly anyone that GW has always had historical grade and exploratory data going back more than 50 years, and the fact that it was derived from the search for Thorium, not REE's, has always supported it's credibility, as those seeking Thorium had no reason to exaggerate the amount of what was then relatively low value surplus overburden, suitable mostly for the tailing piles.  

The company(GWG) knew very well what it had, and that same information was certainly available for anyone willing to take the time and read the materials available.  I did.  I give some strategic credit to Billingsley and Engdahl for not making a big fuss about it, because it might have attracted the wrong type of attention if the kind of information being made public now had been highly publicized earlier.  I think it's safe to say that more than a few will be surprised at the content of the PEA.  Some even post right here on this board.

In reference to the large volume of posts apparently put out by persons I seem to have on ignore, they would look to be living proof of the adage that you learn more with your mouth shut than when it's open.  There are many here who have a very good grasp of the company's prospects who post very seldom, but when they do, they know what they are talking about, and it behooves the rest of us to listen to what they say.....