Once again i do not understand what you bashers are talking bout...attached is a quote from halcro.....3 indepentant geos have signed off on the report...deeming it to be compliant...so if all they had to do was file it...whats the holdup?....halro asked if i had overlooked bcsc involvement...halc are you on auto pilot today ?  ...it is their involvement i questioned...bcsc wanted an audit...done...why is the bcsc questioning the size of the report ?....is it tooooo big or them....?....why does size matter?....if compliant release!..who is watching the bcsc ?....who is watching the watchdog ?....better shorten the leash...or get rid of the watchdog!...........................Chowderhead...to get the CTO lifted (issued for filing a non-compliant NI 43-101 report stating 10.6 million and 90 million ounces), all the company has to do is file a compliant 43-1-1 report showing 10.6 million and 90 million ounces.
If the company can't do that, then it issues a series of retraction letters, corrects the iSEDAR and website content...and wait to see if the BCSC will BPM the company.
Personally, I'd be very, very upset if the BCSC didn't sanction the company as its conduct, IMO, has brought the whole TSX.V market into disrepute.
Of course, chowderhead, you've overlooked, yet again, the TSX and BCSC involvement in the CTO and suspension..