Would Hammer or someone comment on Geo. Potential? Assuming that BGM is trying to include G.P. in the report, could this be the main factor in this long holdup? I know it is allowed but apparently somewhat frowned on by some. I also know if was in PG's Rubicon resource report although was much much lower #'s. If this is the holdup and if numbers anywhere close to the PG BGM non-compliant report, it would explain this long delay.
It is a big deal in this report, and if it is the issue, surely you do not release the report prior to coming to terms with the BCSC on this issue.