Big, This all gets a bit tuff.  I will make some comments as to what i read in your post and those of a few others.  I respect the majority (basically all) of what you have to say.  You have demonstrated yourself as an investor who reads the negative, and uses it to your positive investment statagy.  Even after Halcro has beat you up verbally, it seems you recognize that his post have merrit.  ( My own comment... if you dont think what Halcro is posting, is real, you really need to think about it.  I know it is all on the negative, but you should realy take into account these faCTS,  they are very sig.IMO.)   I have said over and over that I think the property has upside, but, I also think the report was lacking in so many ways.  You can't make these broad claims without taking the time to do the science. It is always nice to think about the upside, but upside takes lots of $ to prove, not just a broad interpritation.  I shouldn't speak for Mr. Bloomfield here, but I will.  He didn't say the property didn't have upside in the link you provided, he only suggested that the science was not in place to make those kind of claims.  I honestly believe that he has concerns about the claims that current management makes with regards to what it does in the Jr. sector.  FWIW, i have had 2 glasses of wine... so...