Newfie, I believe the company is not responsible for a non-compliant resource report.....and I believe they have a solid explanation for why they released PETER GEORGE"s REPORT   NOT  BGM'S REPORT ......., they hired someone with credentials and released HIS numbers.......end of story.   They may try, but there case is weak and there is an argument that if they choose to ignore PG's report the punishment would be worse. 

 

Personally I believe the numbers will be GOOD but materially different (3-5M )   , and I think they will have to do an entire new resource report and denounce the old one.  Part of me suspects that may be already in process.   After that there will be some hurdles to clear and money to raise before re-trading. Everyone knows my thoughts regarding this company going forward and nothing has changed for over a year except I dont talk to the company anymore because I'm tired of the 100% success rate of never holding a timeline promise. 

 

I do believe there is an outside chance that PG's numbers will stand ...(the inferred one) , I also was always under the impression that Snowden was AUDITING PG's work....NOT coming up with there own numbers.....

although I do know they were due out with a technical report for COW after the resource report.....

 

clear as mud....