I also full support Lenic announcing a buy back in shares to reduce the current float. Assuming he gets TSX approval for only up to 10% of the total outstanding shares, he is not obligated to buy back this amount ... however, it sends a strong signal to potential investors that the company is currently undervalued.
As for a reverse stock split, I agree that this would NOT be a good idea, and since he is also a significant shareholder, he probably also would not want to do this.
For what it's worth, here's some general info on stock splits.
Stock splits may seem like a gift to some investors, but there is little evidence that you benefit in any meaningful way when a company splits its stock.
Here’s what happens. Amalgamated Kumquats, which is currently priced at $80 per share, announces a 2-for-1 stock split. If you own 100 shares before the split worth $8,000, you will own 200 shares worth $8,000 after the split.
The market automatically marks down the price of the stock by the divisor of the split. The $80 per share price becomes $40 per share.
There are other splits such as 3-for-1 and 3-for-2, however 2-for-1 seems the most common.
It terms of what your holdings are worth, nothing changes. In terms of what the company is worth, nothing changes. So, why do it?
- Perception – Some companies worry when the per share price gets too high that it will scare off some investors, especially small investors. Splitting the stock brings the per share price down to a reasonable level.
- Liquidity – If a stock’s price rises into the hundreds of dollars per share, it may reduce the trading volume. Increasing the number of outstanding shares at a lower per share price aids liquidity.
Is it Good for Investors?
Some investors say a stock split is a sign that a stock is doing well and they consider it a buy signal. I would caution reading too much into a stock split by itself.
You should always look at the whole picture before making an investment decision. If you want to use stock splits as a marker for stocks to consider for further evaluation, that is a reasonable idea, but don’t stop there with your research.
If you are interested in following stock splits, MSN Money publishes a stock split calendar that lists upcoming splits.
You should watch out for one type of split as a possible danger signal and that’s the reverse split.
In a reverse split, the company reduces the number of outstanding shares and the per share price rises accordingly.
For example, a company might execute a 1-for-2 reverse stock split, which means for every two shares you own, you would now own one and the per share price doubles.
A reverse stock split is often used to prop up a stock’s price, since the price rises on the split. Often a company will do a reverse split to keep the stock price from falling below the minimum required by the stock exchange where it is listed.
Clearly, this is a sign that something is wrong if a company can’t keep its stock price above the exchange’s minimum listing price and caution is advised.
When you paid stockbrokers based on the number of shares you purchased, it made sense to buy a stock before it split. However, most brokers now charge a flat fee, so timing a purchase before or after a split doesn’t make much sense from that perspective. Ultimately, you should buy a stock based on whether it meets the fundamental standards you require and not on whether it will or will not split.