500boe/d  and that includes the new 265boed production?

And you think thats good?

Am I missing something?... they were saying that they had 650boed without the 256 although the financials didn't support that. So I guess its fair to say that if an annouced 650 equates to an actual of 500 less 256 or 244BOE/d then I would guess they we should look for an actual of 1200 x(244/650) or 450 boe/d
Anyway its becoming obvious why the reserve is so low, even though they can hit an initial flow rate thats relatively high it rapidly tails off.
Big question is whats the reserve like on these new properties... presumably a lot better since those flow rates have been established for awhile now.