Brex your "logic" is both flawed and simplistic.  The share holder vote took place AFTER the defamation suit became public knowledge, so what the 99.5% approval reflects is that shareholders fully support AMK management now that they have been made aware of the activities TUO management is alleged to have engaged in.  The 99.5% cannot be extrapolated to provide a reflection of share holders opinions before the defamation suit was announced as you are implying it does.  Also the vote does not take into account the opinion of potential investors who may have refrained from investing in AMK due to the lies being written on these boards, so in effect it has no bearing on the remedies AMK is seeking from the court.