Close

Welcome back to Stockhouse
Member Sign In

Email or Username:
Password:
Close

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Enter your email address:
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Level II  |  Charts  |  Profile  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History

Sino Forest Corporation T.TRE

Price: N/A | Change: N/A | %Change: N/A
Volume: 0 | Day High/Low: N/A/N/A | 52 Week High/Low: 7.38/4.15
View modes: 
0 stars

USU to LEU

This is the way a Chapter 11 or CCAA SHOULD happen. Announce it first, and then the terms. Then make it happen. I was able to squeeze out a profit from the trading yesterday to the restructured shares...read more
0 stars

How brave is the OSC?

Since China's government has confirmed Sino-Forest's ownership of 800,000 hectares forrests in China, the only case that the OSC is right about its allegations against Sino-Forest is that China's...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:$8 million OSC settled with E&Y

All you are doing is covering OSC's butt to make its action against Sino-Forest reasonable, to make the lose of shareholders seem to be shareholders' own fault. The OSC and China disagree with each...read more
0 stars

RE:$8 million OSC settled with E&Y

I'm no friend of the OSC. They shouldn't have allowed this p-o-s to be listed in the first place. But you should be blaming the BOD/IC for blowing the whistle then. Also Chan and Gang and your beloved...read more
0 stars

$8 million OSC settled with E&Y

http://business.financialpost.com/2014/09/30/ernst-young-to-pay-8m-to-settle-osc-allegations-of-improper-audits-in-sino-forest-and-zungui-haixi-case/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter "OSC vice...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:OSC plans to use E&Y as witnesses

Don't know what you want to say. I have sent all evidences I collected to the OSC. The OSC is not suable for it is protected by laws. The very well protection of the OSC is also a fact to make the...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:OSC plans to use E&Y as witnesses

Heidi, you're probably like those in guinea who are attacking the Red Cross workers in the fight against Ebola. Where is the proof that the natives were infected and virus was not brought by those...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:OSC plans to use E&Y as witnesses

Why do you always speculate to one side only? You're obviously working for Chan. I said the OSC is responsible for allowing the RTO to take place without proper follow up. Of course no concessions...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:OSC's use of no-contest settlement is controversial

Don't what you're smoking, but E&Y is paying. Why would Sino F do it as the allegations were against E&Y not doing their job properly? Link to the terms. http://www.classaction.ca/CMSFiles/PDF...read more
0 stars

RE:OSC plans to use E&Y as witnesses

Now the OSC has two "witnesses": E&Y - who denied all allegations, saying after the OSC seeing their audit papers on Sino-Forest, the OSC will agreen that E&Y's work meets professional standards; Mr...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:OSC's use of no-contest settlement is controversial

No detailed information about the OSC-E&Y settlement has been revealed. But the $117 million for E&Y's settlement is paid by Sino-Forest's insurance, both stated in the settlement paper and Gowlings...read more
0 stars

OSC plans to use E&Y as witnesses

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/ernst-young-tentative-deal-canada-sino-forest-audit-003524621--finance.html  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:OSC's use of no-contest settlement is controversial

Even though the allegations are against E&Y? Why would Sino F's insurance pay for E&Y's deficiency? Post a link! I looked but didn't find anything, probably one of your misinterpretations.  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:RE:OSC's use of no-contest settlement is controversial

It seems that you really do not know,  majority of the money for settlement, if not all of them, will be paid from the insurance which bought by Sino-Forest.  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:OSC's use of no-contest settlement is controversial

Ok sure, the OSC made allegations against E&Y but never actually wanted to go to court, was just for show. And $117M or whatever is a small price for E&Y to pay even though the OSC doesn't have the...read more
0 stars

OSC's use of no-contest settlement is controversial

The OSC has never shown any evidence for its allegations, and it has not responded to Ned Goodman's blame that the OSC has made wrong allegation which destroyed the company. Furthermore, Chinese...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:Say NO to no-contest settlement between OSC and E&Y

Neither would the OSC go to court. It all depends on the OSC's attitude, if it won't accept no-contest settlement, there won't be no-contest settlement if E&Y wants. For E&Y it is much easier not...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:Say NO to no-contest settlement between OSC and E&Y

Do you know what a no contest settlement really means? That E&Y would rather not go to court. Jeez.  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:RE:Say NO to no-contest settlement between OSC and E&Y

If the OSC can prove any of the allegation it made, why does it need the no-contest settlement? I have said in my post, the no-contest settlement will muddy the waters, and no truth can be revealed...read more
0 stars

RE:Say NO to no-contest settlement between OSC and E&Y

What did you do to help make those allegations against E&Y? Instead you were busy covering Chan's butt, and unwittingly defending the BOD in their reasons for going into CCAA. Good job. If E&Y were so...read more