That mine web arcticle says another thing too that those with deep enough pockets can screw you even if it is the truth. In that libel case and maybe the defendant went to far but that still does mean there was any less truth to the anger and frustration at what occurred. We all know the media is used by the rich and powerful to get their way by the use of propaganda and outright mistruths that paint a picture that sends the message that something that may not be what it is supposed to be. eg processes might not work, politcal attack ads, advertising, legal drug promotions all are used to sell you stuff that always over promises and underdelivers more than you ever get but thats considered fair play. Something wrong there I'd say. But I guess thats is why these things end up in court.