Welcome back to Stockhouse
Member Sign In

Email or Username:

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Enter your email address:
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Level II  |  Charts  |  Profile  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Analysts  |  Earnings  |  Insiders

01 Communique Laboratory Inc T.ONE

Sector: Technology | Sub-Sector: Software - Application

Price: $0.25 | Change: $0.00 | %Change: 0.00%
Volume: 12,750 | Day High/Low: 0.25/0.24 | 52 Week High/Low: 0.52/0.145
View modes: 
1 star


I see that ONE is in the healthcare business according to Nesbit. Nice for you STILL shareholders.  rate and reply
4.5 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:summary judgement

The LOGM decision is eligible for appeal to the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) as are most (if not all) court decisions but the court accepts or rejects cases based on fundamentals of law or the importance more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:summary judgement

Is the Logmein verdict of non infringement able to be appealed to the supreme court? If in fact it was due to procedural error by B&H. Not certain this was ever explained.  rate and reply
5 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:summary judgement

A small part of the story is that Citrix asked the California court for a Summary Judgement, probably with the hope that a CAFC appeal would set the whole process back another year or even the more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:summary judgement

See District Court rule 56. Court told the legal's their joint request for clarification was a dud, court had already told them the schedule was not following the rules but the already agreed to more
0 stars

RE:RE:summary judgement

How can EITHER side know whether they want to apply for a SJ, UNTIL the details of the Markman is released?  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:summary judgement

Slag it's unclear who asked for it from the joint submission. Maybe they both want it? For those who didn't read Ludwig's last post on this, a dispositive motion 'here' is also considered a more
0 stars

summary judgement

which side asked for a SJ?  rate and reply
5 stars

RE:RE:A little push to the Court

Sounds like Lioi is prepared to rule on the Markman sooner than later. Then on with the schedule for a Summary Judgement hearing and other maters. You have a pretty good handle on this... thanks more
3 stars

RE:RE:O! winner

Enjoy your life Onlyone1 and thanks for selling all your shares to me and my friends. Nice that you are Finally leaving. Are You really?  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:O! winner

The price last time was LESS than $1 million from LOGM. You are delusional so its time to leave .  rate and reply
3 stars

O! winner

Onlyone1 you cannot honour your word even after selling $4400 worth of your shares. Go buy a hot dog wagon Bun boy or play your Make believe stocks.  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:o1 asking close to Billion

This is the END OF STORY. First of all Andrew did not settle last time for a lot more than 75M. Discovery will state the price we want and it is close to a Billion. What we win or get will be more
1 star

RE:RE:RE:o1 asking close to Billion

If you know Andrew like you say you know him then you would know that he would take his share of the $ 75 million move his family back to China and work on a project with Hitachi. End of story.  rate and reply
1 star

RE:RE:o1 asking close to Billion

Easy Tiger. Your going to lose. I will take your bet. The bet is you take me to Rome my horning little Sweetie. Kisses Victoria  rate and reply
1 star

RE:o1 asking close to Billion

You say 01 is asking for a billion and i say they will  TAKE $ 75 million . You want to bet to see who is closer ? I am not in the stock anymore so i will try and make some $ by betting you .  rate and reply
3 stars

o1 asking close to Billion

TECHNOLOGY asked for 832 million samsung next Smartflash had asked for a bigger payout, but said it was "happy" with the verdict. Apple said it intended to appeal and called more
2.5 stars

01 the Real Deal

O1 is protecting their patents against infringers while been a practising identity. Apple we mention to settlement.  Ooooppps we owe what 533 million. Great, thanks Johnnyo APPLE FACES HUGE $ more
5 stars

Interesting  rate and reply
5 stars

RE:A little push to the Court

"The parties further agree that the scheduling conference provided by the Case Management Plan should be held following this Court’s ruling on claim construction and respectfully request that more