Close

Welcome back to Stockhouse
Member Sign In

Email or Username:
Password:
Close

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Enter your email address:
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Level II  |  Charts  |  Profile  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Analysts  |  Earnings  |  Insiders

Craig Wireless Systems Ltd T.CWG

Sector: Communication Services | Sub-Sector: Telecom Services

Price: $0.06 | Change: $0.00 | %Change: 0.00%
Volume: 0 | Day High/Low: N/A/N/A | 52 Week High/Low: 0.125/0.03
View modes: 
0 stars

Boyds are hard to understand

I got a sense that the Boyds would love to accumulate as many shares as possible for pennies. They make no attempt to communicate any positives - only negatives. I still have shares that will wait for...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:No Respect

didn't this stock go public at $3.50? what has Boyd done with all the value? I guess shareholders got  a tiny bit back in the special dividend..  rate and reply
0 stars

News?

Come on guys, I know you control most of the shares, but give the rest of us an update once in awhile. Thx./ok2  rate and reply
4.5 stars

RE:No Respect

So, I will be the next biggest shareholder behind the Craig family. When the family decides again to take this higher, they will drag me along with them once again to profitability. LOL! This on paper...read more
0 stars

No Respect

Craig announces that Woosh is upgrading their network in New Zealand to enhance system performance for their customers. Cochella is growing their subscriber base and the market is showing Craig zero...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Screaming Buy

I was thinking that they own so many shares that they can easily vote a cheap offer through for the shares they don't have and then go private. the public entitiy is just costing (mostly) them money...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Screaming Buy

Not sure I understand your point. Why would the Craig's separate themselves as shareholders from the rest of us? Doesn't make sense. Backwards thinking on your part./ok2  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:Run on Craig

Don't have a clue what todays trading is about. I do however agree with you about the Craigs eventually doing well for themselves and the shareholders. I am holding.  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Screaming Buy

but the fact that one family controls 75% of the stock is precisely why there's a risk for them (the Craig's) to take it private for themselves and hang the minority shareholders.  rate and reply
0 stars

Run on Craig

Why the run on Craig today? The market is pretty much in the dumpster, but not Craig. Anyone have any thoughts on what might be up?/ok2  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Screaming Buy

No, I don't see going private as on the radar and if it happens, not a risk. Not when the Company Insiders control about 73-74 % of the total number of outstanding Subordinate Voting shares and the...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Screaming Buy

You don't agree that going private is a risk?  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:Screaming Buy

Disagree with your post./ok2  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:Screaming Buy

Risk: Craigs will take this private and public share holders will get little.  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:RE:Screaming Buy

Acquired 10,000 more shares today, thanks to the seller. This is trading at about 13.5 % of book value. Craig insiders own about 73 % of the total float. Of the remaining 12 million shares, many of...read more
0 stars

RE:Screaming Buy

Not much volume today to drive the price back down to 5 cents. Who is selling at 5 cents? So go ahead then, keep selling. I am locked and loaded, looking for more shares. I have done very well with...read more
0 stars

Screaming Buy

This is a screaming buy at 5 cents/share. TDWaterhouse still has a book value of 37 cents/share. Trading at 13.5 % of book./ok2  rate and reply