Another note to all those negative Nancy's out there.  You say that Canacol is paying too much for Shona and that it's lands are useless in many ways, if this is the case, then why have the 2 auditor's (who have MUCH MORE information than any of you about the actual situation) say the deal is beneficial for Canacol.  Surely if Canacol was overpaying or if Shona had such bad land holdings the auditor's would share this information with the Canacol.