Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Level II  |  Charts  |  Profile  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History

Sino Forest Corporation T.TRE

Price: N/A | Change: N/A | % Change: N/A
Volume: 0 | Day High/Low: N/A/N/A | 52 Week High/Low: 7.38/4.15

View modes: 
0 stars

RE:Why OSC refuses to recognize the Chinese FB's confirmations

First, the opinion that Forestry Bureaus' confirmations are not legally recognized documents, is from a non-PRC lawyer, it is not even considered a legal "legal opinion" according to the Chinse law...read more
0 stars

Why OSC refuses to recognize the Chinese FB's confirmations

Here is the OSC said in the SOA: Confirmations are not legally recognized documents evidencing ownership of timber assets in the PRC. These Confirmations were purportedly granted to Sino-Forest as...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

Why you tried so hard to explain for the OSC? The OSC alleges Sino-Forest of massive fraud and fake contracts, after denied the Chinese Forestry Bureaus' confirmations, because the OSC has taken the...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

The OSC saying the contracts are fake has no bearing in China, or Canada. It's between the company and the Chinese government. From what I recall, they didn't say it was fake actually, but that the...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

Was it not clear enough, that if Allen Chan would not resign, he would be fired by BOD; if E&Y refused to resign, it could not get its license from Canada anymore, or even being sued, since the OSC...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

http://coal.steelguru.com/north_america/15600/l_amp_l_energy_to_voluntarily_delist_from_nasdaq I'm using this board as a channel to talk about Chinese stocks in general. I spoke to the PR guy of...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

Of course there is no representative from Sino-Forest, it has been killed by the OSC, now the assets have a new owner called Emerald.  rate and reply
0 stars

Heidi

Your Dellusional.  The Business existed somewhat and so did the trees.  The Ai's were all connected to insiders taking all the money.  It was shut down by the OSC before it got worse.  They should...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

Yes I know longonsino. We actually share the same body, just different egos. Lately no rep from SF went to the hearings only lawyers for Chan and gang it seems. Let's see what they can dig up.  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

I don't think I have seen you posted anything at that time between summer 2011 and in 2013 when Stockhouse updated, that was the time I talked with Longonsino a lot on this board. What a coincident...read more
0 stars

RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

I remember that goof. He was a crack addict! You're talking to him... I still remember what I said then. The OSC can say it was the IC who alerted them. But the OSC still has to do their DD on the...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:It might not be too late

We retail losers don't have enough info to make any meaningful statement. How can we prove the IC/BOD wrong, that the company could have survived? Or how do we prove the OSC wrong? I think if Chandler...read more
0 stars

"If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

I found in the archive of Stockhouse TRE board, someone with ID "longonsino" , who claimed to be a shareholder, posted the following to argue with me, because she/he believed that the OSC must have...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:It might not be too late

It seems that you have no faith in Canada, don't you believe that Canada has the ability to corrent things which has been done wrong? If the OSC is proved to be wrong, something must be able to be...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:It might not be too late

If the OSC could be sued (which some say they can't), then another possible way is to prove that the company didn't overbook revenue, as the OSC alleges. Good luck for anyone who dares to try. Would...read more
0 stars

RE:It might not be too late

It's too late for us shareholders now. There are only 2 sides being considered: 1) the OSC and MW is right, it's a Ponzi. Nothing for us. 2) the IC is right, company has assets, but company couldn't...read more
0 stars

It might not be too late

If the OSC will admit the mistake now and withdraw all the allegations, it might not be too late. Trees won't go anywhere. Since China recognizes Sino-Forest's contracts, all the trees belongs to...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:A family and the neighbor - whose fault do you think?

The fact is shareholders have lost all investments, despite Sino-Forest's contracts are real and it owns the forest assets, which have been taken over by the creditors. To find out who should be...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:A family and the neighbor - whose fault do you think?

I have no doubt that Sino Forest is far from a provable Ponzi Scheme, which is the bottom line of the 2nd IC report. But my point is, that15% or even less in overbooked revenue is enough for the OSC...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:A family and the neighbor - whose fault do you think?

Go back and check what Jason Martin said after the second IC report, the conclusion was very clear: Sino-Forest chief executive Judson Martin said the independent committee has verified the firm's...read more