Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Level II  |  Charts  |  Profile  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History

Sino Forest Corporation T.TRE

Price: N/A | Change: N/A | % Change: N/A
Volume: 0 | Day High/Low: N/A/N/A | 52 Week High/Low: 7.38/4.15

View modes: 
0 stars

RE:Chinese Connection

I have asked the question nobody can give an anwser for the OSC yet: If the OSC is so sure about the allegations against Sino-Forest and Allen Chan, why there is no request from Canadian government...read more
0 stars

Chinese Connection

Why does Heidi keep protecting Chan? She gets people running in circles with her circular logic. Just like Chan did. Looks like I'm not the only crack smoker!  rate and reply
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:Heidi2014 and MayorRobFord

You got it ok2buy. I definitely filled out my claim for the E&Y settlement, while Heidi opposing the E&Y settlement. Who's the bullshitter? I think she really lost it. I thought I could talk some...read more
0 stars

Chinese Court's ruling

If anyone want to look at the Chinese Court's ruling that the OSC's allegations against Sino-Forest are groundless, you may have the file in the following link translated, although this link gives...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:Heidi2014 and MayorRobFord

Heidi2014, While you are on your search for the truth, the shareholders have NOTHING! TRE has been delisted from trading accounts. Again, worth NOTHING! The E&Y settlement gives shareholders a chance...read more
0 stars

RE:Heidi2014 and MayorRobFord

I have been wondering why some ID stayed on the bullboard, while they seem not caring that much about the case, not care about if the shareholders have been mistreated or not, now seeing your post...read more
0 stars

Heidi2014 and MayorRobFord

While you are both debating the merits of your arguments, I hope you took the time to file with RicePoint for the E&Y settlement money. It would sure be nice to get to the bottom of all this. But in...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:Why OSC refuses to recognize the Chinese FB's confirmations

You have been proved to be bullshiting many times, you do not care if you are giving accurate information or not at all, if you do not care, stop bullshitting about the case. Many shareholders have...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:Why OSC refuses to recognize the Chinese FB's confirmations

Ok, so my recollecton was not that accurate. Anyway, the management is on the hook. That is the big issue. Forget assets. They are either non-recoverable or didn't exist. Honestly don't care at this...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:Why OSC refuses to recognize the Chinese FB's confirmations

You have not read the OSC's Statement of Allegations, have you?  I can copy and paste some of them for you: The Standing Timber Fraud From June 30, 2006 until January 11, 2012 (the “Material Time”),...read more
0 stars

RE:Why OSC refuses to recognize the Chinese FB's confirmations

Based on your excerpt of the statement of allegations, the OSC didn't say the contracts are fake. I recall they suggested it could be hard to enforce those contracts in China, which seems to be true...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

Why am I trying so hard to explain for the OSC? Why are you trying so hard to explain the assets? 2 different points here: 1. If the management performed some inappropriate actions, like signing on...read more
0 stars

RE:Why OSC refuses to recognize the Chinese FB's confirmations

First, the opinion that Forestry Bureaus' confirmations are not legally recognized documents, is from a non-PRC lawyer, it is not even considered a legal "legal opinion" according to the Chinse law...read more
0 stars

Why OSC refuses to recognize the Chinese FB's confirmations

Here is the OSC said in the SOA: Confirmations are not legally recognized documents evidencing ownership of timber assets in the PRC. These Confirmations were purportedly granted to Sino-Forest as...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

Why you tried so hard to explain for the OSC? The OSC alleges Sino-Forest of massive fraud and fake contracts, after denied the Chinese Forestry Bureaus' confirmations, because the OSC has taken the...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

The OSC saying the contracts are fake has no bearing in China, or Canada. It's between the company and the Chinese government. From what I recall, they didn't say it was fake actually, but that the...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

Was it not clear enough, that if Allen Chan would not resign, he would be fired by BOD; if E&Y refused to resign, it could not get its license from Canada anymore, or even being sued, since the OSC...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

http://coal.steelguru.com/north_america/15600/l_amp_l_energy_to_voluntarily_delist_from_nasdaq I'm using this board as a channel to talk about Chinese stocks in general. I spoke to the PR guy of...read more
0 stars

RE:RE:RE:RE: "If the OSC truly has no proven evidence"

Of course there is no representative from Sino-Forest, it has been killed by the OSC, now the assets have a new owner called Emerald.  rate and reply
0 stars

Heidi

Your Dellusional.  The Business existed somewhat and so did the trees.  The Ai's were all connected to insiders taking all the money.  It was shut down by the OSC before it got worse.  They should...read more