Folks, Did you guys read this post from Andrew?http://www.stockhouse.com/bullboards/viewmessage.asp?no=13202548&t=0&all=0&TableID=0 His comment about future market cap is blatantly false. Here are a set of “Comparable” tables, developed by Bill Matlack, from the Kitco website. For Base metal producers: http://www.kitcometals.com/commentaries/Matlack/jun052006.html For Gold producers: http://www.kitco.com/ind/Matlack/jun052006.html Campbell is a copper and gold producer, and has future royalty streams worked out. Campbell’s market cap, about a year from now, could easily be half a billion. The tables show that the market cap could actually be higher (and not be unusual). My earnings target is for earnings of $30 - $80 million (annualized), by the second half of 2007. See links below. This is the problem with these clever posters like AndrewYoung (whom I really believe has a sinister agenda here). They write things like “Campbell will never see a half billion cap”, without any evidence to back it up. The evidence is quite to the contrary, and here you see link to prove it. Two months ago, AndrewTroll was posting that a company with 300 or 400 million share couldn’t possibly go anywhere in price. But you look at the tables, and you see many companies with shares outstanding above 400 million shares. BGO has over 400 million shares, doesn’t even have a profit yet, and yet trades around $5.00. (I was recommending BGO at 39 cents in 2001). And in the midcap or smallcap Gold categories, I see many companies with PE ratio or 20, 40, or even more than 60. A PE of 40 (which I do admit is high) would give CCH a share price of $8.00 Look guys, you can use more conservative numbers in you models of you want. That’s OK. You can have a sell target of $1.00 a share if you want to play it conservative. But this trash that Andrew writes… he’s just lying to you. The tables show it. Of course our Basher/Troll “sympathizer” (the Chihuahua) would never point out “they” don’t back up anything they write. They get a free pass. Here are some “Due Diligence” posts on production and production costs: http://www.stockhouse.com/bullboards/viewmessage.asp?no=13116560&tableid=1 http://www.stockhouse.com/bullboards/viewmessage.asp?no=13116579&tableid=1 Now sit back and realize that Campbell will be drilling all three of their main properties. We see gold/copper production targets in their press releases. For Copper Rand, those targets are listed is excruciating detail, in the Prospectus. Ok, now plug in some numbers is Campbell’s production went UP by 50% in 2008. And the POG was at $800, or $900. This last part is all hypothetical. But it’s quite possible to see earnings even greater than $80 million, under the right conditions. Benson