Alternative energy darling backs up its cost savings promise

Executive Broadcasts

Latest Broadcasts

Stockhouse Inc.

STKH

Internet/Technology

URANIUM NORTH RESOURCES CORP

V.UNR

BASIC MATERIALS - METALS & MINING

Petro Vista Energy Corp

V.PTV

BASIC MATERIALS - ENERGY

Skyline Investor Relations

SKYLINE

Investor Relations

TapImmune Inc.

TPIM

Healthcare

Mexivada Mining Corp.

V.MNV

Natural Resources

Visit the Executive Broadcast Center

INVESTOR MARKETPLACE

An excellent place to start your search for new investments!

add to favorites

print email

Alternative energy darling backs up its cost savings promise

5/17/2008 8:59:09 AM | Charles Morand - Editor

700 Reads

Rate this

clarity
3

clarity : 3
Rate this:

overall quality
2 overall quality : 2
Average quality rating by the Stockhouse community.

credibility
2

credibility : 2
Rate this:

usefulness
3

usefulness : 3
Rate this:

Solar cell technology maker gets third-party endorsement of its technology.

Timminco (OTO: TIMNF, Bullboard) (TSX: T.TIM, Bullboard) was, without a doubt, one of the great solar plays of 2007. The Toronto-based company, which has yet to turn a profit, claims it has come up with a process to produce solar-grade metallurgical silicon with cell efficiencies of about 14%. Metallurgical silicon allows for important energy cost savings in the production process (~70%), so being able to approach cell efficiencies reached by conventional solar-grade silicon processes could mean an important cost advantage for metallurgical silicon producers when measured on a per watt basis.

Eventually, certain people began publicly doubting Timminco's claim, partially because no hard evidence had been put forth (besides a few positive client testimonials), and partially because some were eager to cover short positions probably taken while the stock was shooting up. As a result, the stock came under pressure.

Finally, last week, Timminco silenced its critics by announcing that a third-party had verified and lauded its technology, and by upgrading a major contract. The third-party is Photon Consulting, a solar market research agency with a strong reputation.

But, while the Photon folks seem to have nothing but good things to say about the Timminco process, others are doubting whether Photon have sufficient technology and production process expertise to make a call on the veracity of Timminco's claims (from what I could gather, these "others" are mainly competitors). Judging by the stock's moves since the announcement, it seems as though investors are siding with management for now.

The full results of Photon's analysis won't be known until the close of markets Thursday. Seeing as the Photon principal in charge of this project said that Timminco had the potential to "reshap[e] the silicon industry," it will certainly be interesting to hear the full details of what he has to say. Interested in finding out more about what could be a breakthrough in solar cell manufacturing? Be sure to tune in to the call on Wednesday at EST4:30pm. All details are available here (PDF document).

DISCLOSURE: The author does not have a position in Timminco.

Permanent link

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Charles Morand - Editor

Charles is a personal cleantech investor and has worked at an investment research firm where his specialties included carbon finance and clean technology. He holds a BA from the University of British Columbia, an MSc from the London School of Economics and has completed the Canadian Securities Course. He is currently pursuing a full-time MBA at the Richard Ivey School of Business at the University of Western Ontario.

AltEnergyStocks.com provides original research into alternative energy, renewable energy, and clean technology companies.

Stockhouse Conflict and Disclosure Policy:

Stockgroup Media Inc., owners and operators of Stockhouse.ca/com, has established rules to ensure that there is no appearance of impropriety on the part of any Stockhouse writers who discuss or name individual public companies in the content published on the Stockhouse websites. The content of Stockhouse Editorial articles are the opinion of the writer and any reliance on the content of these articles shall be at your sole risk.

Stockhouse Editorial writers may own, buy, or sell shares in public companies mentioned in their articles. Please be advised that a conflict may exist and that any investment decisions you make are your own responsibility. Additionally, our Editorial writers are not registered investment advisors. You should not make any kind of investment decision in relation to these articles or stocks discussed in them without first obtaining independent investment advice from a registered investment advisor.

Facts relied upon by our Editorial writers in arriving at their opinions are generally provided by the subject companies or gathered by our Editorial writers from other public and/or private sources. These facts may be in error and if so, the opinions of our Editorial writers may be materially different.

Rules applying to Stockhouse Editorial Writers

Stockhouse Editorial writers may own stock of any company they cover, but at the bottom of the article or within the article they must clearly and prominently state their ownership position in the company.

Stockhouse Editorial writers cannot solicit, accept, or agree to receive anything of value given or paid with the intent of influencing their editorial articles published on Stockhouse.

Stockhouse Editorial writers are not permitted to write articles that attempt to influence or benefit persons connected to the writer such as family or friends, , except where disclosure is made in the same way as if the writer him/herself owns stock.

Stockhouse notifies each Editorial writer about these rules but in case of a possible breach of our rules, we may not be in a position to find out or investigate the facts. We rely on the integrity of our writers to ensure that our rules are followed.

FREE REPORTS